Quality as an USP

I recently gave my first impressions on PopCap games latest casual title Plants vs Zombies. It’s a really fun game that has very little in common with the other hit titles from PopCap except for one thing: quality. All of PopCaps games are genuine quality products with little if any glitches and no flimsy art that cramps their style.
Well so what? It’s simple, quality is lacking in a lot of big titles. And quality is the ultimate deal breaker with entertainment. Let’s explore why:

Most games are quality products that have bugs, glitches or unfinished parts due to last minute feature additions or late night crunching to ship the title. This is all well and good. We seem to be selling a lot of games. But looking at the numbers in another light we also see that individual titles seem to sell less from year to year. This decline can’t be solely based on one factor of course; competition, piracy mega hits like World of Warcraft have very clear effects on the sales of games. But quality is a factor that has been overlooked for a very long time from the developers point of view. Quality over a certain “it works dammit” threshold just isn’t cost efficient enough.

Before I give a few examples of why this is not necessarily true let me just define what I mean with quality:

Quality doesn’t mean that the game is good. It means that whatever your game or product does it does good.

You never see a Ferrari with a wobbly steering wheel. That would devastate the drivers experience of the Ferrari. Likewise you seldom see cartoon characters in real world sitcoms. Or a pinkish plastic cover, that falls off, on your new MacBook. So why is it we find crashes, graphical glitches, strange sounds and missing textures in AAA games?

Because quality was not an issue for the developer. The features were.

Look again at PopCap games, do they have the features of other casual titles? In some cases yes, in others no. Apple’s iPhone isn’t close to cheaper smart phones in terms of features and power. Yet it outsells them ten to one. The list goes on. But the point is that production companies might want to start looking into quality instead of features.

Maybe you don’t need to be able to customize everything in the game. Maybe it just needs to look great from the start.

2 thoughts on “Quality as an USP

  1. I understand what you mean and I agree to a great extend. However; there’s also the factor of persistence.
    Your examples with PopCap and Apple are good but they’re also built up their reputation around this USP. If I buy an Apple product, I except it to be of high quality. If I get a new PopCap-game, even if it might not be fun I know it’ll have a very solid production.
    But if I’m to release a new product, as a newly formed company it’s hard to convince the consumer of the greatness of the quality. Surely, if I can keep the retailing alive long enough for it to “set in” for poeple, so they understand it might work.
    PopCap and Apple have been around for many, many years and have been able to uphold their quality, so I don’t think it’s just about one product, but more of a company philosophy, as with Valve and Blizzard (to keep things within the gaming industry).
    Good post!

    Like

    1. Well yes, branding is extremely important. But branding is built upon successful products NOT the other way around.
      Successful product = strong brand = more sales. You can never start with a strong brand. And neither Apple nor PopCap did.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s